<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exposed Genitals of Jesus Displayed in Catholic Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2010/04/15/exposed-genitals-jesus-catholic-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2010/04/15/exposed-genitals-jesus-catholic-church/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj. kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2010/04/15/exposed-genitals-jesus-catholic-church/comment-page-1/#comment-48217</link>
		<dc:creator>sj. kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=2016#comment-48217</guid>
		<description>so why the garment then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so why the garment then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesbian Wear</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2010/04/15/exposed-genitals-jesus-catholic-church/comment-page-1/#comment-48207</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesbian Wear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=2016#comment-48207</guid>
		<description>Wow, I looked at this painting and was at a loss for words.  Not that I was shocked, but I wasn&#039;t exactly quite comfortable with what I was looking at either.  One part of me says that this reinforces the idea that Jesus was a man, a real man. He had the body of a man. But his spirit was Godly.  And even though I&#039;m not sure if this is depicting God in a less respectful way, I also keep in mind that we were created in his image... and perhaps He himself wouldn&#039;t be too upset by this painting.  Thanks for a great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I looked at this painting and was at a loss for words.  Not that I was shocked, but I wasn&#8217;t exactly quite comfortable with what I was looking at either.  One part of me says that this reinforces the idea that Jesus was a man, a real man. He had the body of a man. But his spirit was Godly.  And even though I&#8217;m not sure if this is depicting God in a less respectful way, I also keep in mind that we were created in his image&#8230; and perhaps He himself wouldn&#8217;t be too upset by this painting.  Thanks for a great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

