<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;We choose not to work for homosexuals&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daily dose of queer &#187; Discrimination Pays for Houston Landscapers</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6897</link>
		<dc:creator>daily dose of queer &#187; Discrimination Pays for Houston Landscapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6897</guid>
		<description>[...] Garden Guy, Inc. has been enjoying an increase in business since refusing to provide services to a gay couple last month.  In an interview Friday, Sabrina Farber, 34, co-owner of the company with her husband, Todd, 37, said the company had picked up $40,000 in new business in the past two weeks, while losing only two clients worth about $500 each a year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Garden Guy, Inc. has been enjoying an increase in business since refusing to provide services to a gay couple last month.  In an interview Friday, Sabrina Farber, 34, co-owner of the company with her husband, Todd, 37, said the company had picked up $40,000 in new business in the past two weeks, while losing only two clients worth about $500 each a year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celtic-dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6860</link>
		<dc:creator>celtic-dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6860</guid>
		<description>I love sanctimonious posturing!  Let&#039;s hope some folks offer to do business and then blow them off because &quot;we don&#039;t hire Christianist hypocrites!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love sanctimonious posturing!  Let&#8217;s hope some folks offer to do business and then blow them off because &#8220;we don&#8217;t hire Christianist hypocrites!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daily dose of queer &#187; Signs from the Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>daily dose of queer &#187; Signs from the Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>[...] Like these comments on â€œWe choose not to work for homosexualsâ€:  For some people men sticking their penises into each others bottoms turn some people off. If that doesn`t float there boat why should they have to go do landscaping for people who do things they do not like. I suppose they should have to perform landscaping for pedophiles based upon your logic.  More power to them. If they donâ€™t want to deal with queers - or anyone else for that matter - they have the right to refuse. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like these comments on â€œWe choose not to work for homosexualsâ€:  For some people men sticking their penises into each others bottoms turn some people off. If that doesn`t float there boat why should they have to go do landscaping for people who do things they do not like. I suppose they should have to perform landscaping for pedophiles based upon your logic.  More power to them. If they donâ€™t want to deal with queers &#8211; or anyone else for that matter &#8211; they have the right to refuse. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley DeWiley</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley DeWiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6851</guid>
		<description>More power to them. If they don&#039;t want to deal with queers - or anyone else for that matter - they have the right to refuse. 

The First Amendment says we have freedom to associate. As I understand it, it means we can choose to associate, or choose NOT to associate, with whomever we please. 

Some folks choose not to associate with fags. That is their right. 

Riley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More power to them. If they don&#8217;t want to deal with queers &#8211; or anyone else for that matter &#8211; they have the right to refuse. </p>
<p>The First Amendment says we have freedom to associate. As I understand it, it means we can choose to associate, or choose NOT to associate, with whomever we please. </p>
<p>Some folks choose not to associate with fags. That is their right. </p>
<p>Riley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6848</link>
		<dc:creator>George Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6848</guid>
		<description>For some people men sticking their penises into each others bottoms turn some people off.   If that doesn`t float there boat why should they have to go do landscaping for people who do things they do not like.  I suppose they should have to perform landscaping for pedophiles based upon your logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some people men sticking their penises into each others bottoms turn some people off.   If that doesn`t float there boat why should they have to go do landscaping for people who do things they do not like.  I suppose they should have to perform landscaping for pedophiles based upon your logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6617</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6617</guid>
		<description>Jami, I just added the the following to the one line ( &quot;They should refuse to do business with all sinners.&quot; ) that was alone in my original post. 

&quot;Were I posting, I would commend the Farbers for standing by their principles in an age where money trumps all.

They might, however, consider climbing up one more rung on the moral ladder.&quot;

Hopefully that gives the words more context.

Maybe he *is* being sarcastic.  It wasn&#039;t clear to me, but what do I know... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jami, I just added the the following to the one line ( &#8220;They should refuse to do business with all sinners.&#8221; ) that was alone in my original post. </p>
<p>&#8220;Were I posting, I would commend the Farbers for standing by their principles in an age where money trumps all.</p>
<p>They might, however, consider climbing up one more rung on the moral ladder.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hopefully that gives the words more context.</p>
<p>Maybe he *is* being sarcastic.  It wasn&#8217;t clear to me, but what do I know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/10/28/we-choose-not-to-work-for-homosexuals/#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>Lest that quote of Rick Casey&#039;s be taken out of context (and it is), the complete quote basically said that they should refuse to business with all sinners - like liars, cheats, theives, adulterers, etc.  In a word, they should refuse to do business with everybody.  Mr. Casey thought they were stupid for their actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lest that quote of Rick Casey&#8217;s be taken out of context (and it is), the complete quote basically said that they should refuse to business with all sinners &#8211; like liars, cheats, theives, adulterers, etc.  In a word, they should refuse to do business with everybody.  Mr. Casey thought they were stupid for their actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

