<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Major Networks Refuse to Air Gay-Friendly Church Ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daily dose of queer &#187; LOGO Refuses Gay-Friendly United Church of Christ Ad</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>daily dose of queer &#187; LOGO Refuses Gay-Friendly United Church of Christ Ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=1078#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>[...] I previously posted here about CBS, Fox, ABC and NBC refusing to air this United Church of Christ ad. It was reported on Friday that LOGO, MTV&#8217;s channel for &#8220;entertainment programming for lesbians and gays and just about anyone who enjoys a gay point of view,&#8221; is also refusing to air the church&#8217;s commercial &#8220;because of the political nature of its content.&#8221; Yes, the &#8220;gay channel&#8221; feels that airing the gay-friendly church ad would be going too far.   When asked for an official reason, MTV Networks responded, &#8220;Our guidelines state we will not accept religious advertisements that may be deemed as disparaging to another religion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I previously posted here about CBS, Fox, ABC and NBC refusing to air this United Church of Christ ad. It was reported on Friday that LOGO, MTV&#8217;s channel for &#8220;entertainment programming for lesbians and gays and just about anyone who enjoys a gay point of view,&#8221; is also refusing to air the church&#8217;s commercial &#8220;because of the political nature of its content.&#8221; Yes, the &#8220;gay channel&#8221; feels that airing the gay-friendly church ad would be going too far.   When asked for an official reason, MTV Networks responded, &#8220;Our guidelines state we will not accept religious advertisements that may be deemed as disparaging to another religion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=1078#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you guys know that &quot;public controversy&quot; is network-speak for anything either vaguely relating to sex or anything that pisses off the zealot right?  Unless it&#039;s during sweeps week in which case it becomes network-speak for &quot;our leading story on tonight&#039;s news&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you guys know that &#8220;public controversy&#8221; is network-speak for anything either vaguely relating to sex or anything that pisses off the zealot right?  Unless it&#8217;s during sweeps week in which case it becomes network-speak for &#8220;our leading story on tonight&#8217;s news&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=1078#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, Sue!

Jen, I was thinking the same thing too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, Sue!</p>
<p>Jen, I was thinking the same thing too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=1078#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>NBC avoids airing commercials that involve public controversy? Don&#039;t they run Army recruitment ads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC avoids airing commercials that involve public controversy? Don&#8217;t they run Army recruitment ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/2006/03/29/major-networks-refuse-to-air-gay-friendly-church-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydoseofqueer.com/?p=1078#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>You can see the web version of the commercial here:

http://www.ucc.org/commercial.html

I think it was quite tastefully done and it further confirms my theory that the traditional networks are dinosaurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see the web version of the commercial here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucc.org/commercial.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ucc.org/commercial.html</a></p>
<p>I think it was quite tastefully done and it further confirms my theory that the traditional networks are dinosaurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

